Information Services banner Edinburgh Research Archive The University of Edinburgh crest

Edinburgh Research Archive >
Physics, School of  >
Physics thesis and dissertation collection >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

This item has been viewed 33 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Kitchen2011.pdf55.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Exploration, quantification, and mitigation of systematic error in high-throughput approaches to gene-expression profiling: implications for data reproducibility
Authors: Kitchen, Robert Raymond
Supervisor(s): van Hemert, Jano
Sims, Andy
Clarke, Peter
Ogilvie, Varrie
Issue Date: 23-Nov-2011
Publisher: The University of Edinburgh
Abstract: Technological and methodological advances in the fields of medical and life-sciences have, over the last 25 years, revolutionised the way in which cellular activity is measured at the molecular level. Three such advances have provided a means of accurately and rapidly quantifying mRNA, from the development of quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR), to DNA microarrays, and second-generation RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). Despite consistent improvements in measurement precision and sample throughput, the data generated continue to be a ffected by high levels of variability due to the use of biologically distinct experimental subjects, practical restrictions necessitating the use of small sample sizes, and technical noise introduced during frequently complex sample preparation and analysis procedures. A series of experiments were performed during this project to pro le sources of technical noise in each of these three techniques, with the aim of using the information to produce more accurate and more reliable results. The mechanisms for the introduction of confounding noise in these experiments are highly unpredictable. The variance structure of a qPCR experiment, for example, depends on the particular tissue-type and gene under assessment while expression data obtained by microarray can be greatly influenced by the day on which each array was processed and scanned. RNA-seq, on the other hand, produces data that appear very consistent in terms of differences between technical replicates, however there exist large differences when results are compared against those reported by microarray, which require careful interpretation. It is demonstrated in this thesis that by quantifying some of the major sources of noise in an experiment and utilising compensation mechanisms, either pre- or post-hoc, researchers are better equipped to perform experiments that are more robust, more accurate, and more consistent.
Sponsor(s): Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
Keywords: gene-expression
quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
technical noise
batch effects
Appears in Collections:Physics thesis and dissertation collection

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © The University of Edinburgh 2013, and/or the original authors. Privacy and Cookies Policy