Information Services banner Edinburgh Research Archive The University of Edinburgh crest

Edinburgh Research Archive >
Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of >
Linguistics and English Language >
Linguistics and English Language Masters thesis collection >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/5333

This item has been viewed 95 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Complete Dissertation.pdfDissertation final316.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: How Powerful Are Elements? An Evaluation of the Adequacy of Element Thory in Phonological Representations
Authors: Chen, Yun-Ling
Supervisor(s): Honeybone, Patrick
Issue Date: 31-Aug-2010
Publisher: The University of Edinburgh
Abstract: In this dissertation, I resume the discussion of privative features as a notational device in segmental representation. I argue from both theoretical and empirical perspectives that element theory is a better theory of phonological representation than the binary-feature system. First, I argue that element theory is a more constrained and thus preferable theory since, with the proposal of single-valued features and a small element inventory, it is exempted from overgeneration of natural classes and phonological processes. Next, in case studies, I weigh the element-based representations of vowel shift, vowel harmony and consonantal lenition against the feature-based representations. The result of the evaluation shows that, compared to binary approaches, element theory is better in capturing the nature of various phonological processes. It generally provides non-arbitrary representations that can mirror how the processes occur, though it also has its limit in the characterization of Pasiego height harmony and consonantal affrication as well as providing a non-arbitrary account for occurrence of certain types of lenition in particular environments.
Keywords: element theory
privativity
segmental representation
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/5333
Appears in Collections:Linguistics and English Language Masters thesis collection

Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © The University of Edinburgh 2013, and/or the original authors. Privacy and Cookies Policy