Information Services banner Edinburgh Research Archive The University of Edinburgh crest

Edinburgh Research Archive >
Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of >
Psychology >
Psychology Undergraduate thesis collection >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/4937

This item has been viewed 23 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Freeden, Elspeth. Thesis 2010.pdfonly available to ed.ac.uk127.09 kBAdobe PDF
Title: A Discourse Analysis: How Politicians and Citizens talk about their own Carbon Footprints
Authors: Freeden, Elspeth E. R.
Supervisor(s): Widdicombe, Sue
Issue Date: 30-Jun-2010
Publisher: The University of Edinburgh
Abstract: The majority of scientific findings on Global Warming indicate that it is taking place and that it is largely caused by the activities of human beings. This implies that psychology, especially social psychology, has a vital role to play in reducing the impact human activity is having on our planet. Several discourse analyses, including that by Kurz, Donaghue, Rapley & Walker (2005), have looked into how people talk about their impact on the environment in reference to specific areas, in Kurz et al.’s (2005) study this was water and energy conservation. The current study aimed to find how politicians and citizens in Scotland talk about the more all encompassing topic of their own carbon footprints and their opinions of climate change. Eight citizens and four politicians from a Scottish city were recorded having semi-structured interviews. The interview was held as an informal discussion and the respondents were encouraged to speak openly. The recordings were then transcribed and analysed, finding three key themes. Firstly respondents were found to present themselves in a positive light in spite of confessions to unsustainable actions. Secondly, respondents discursively distanced themselves from the ultimate responsibility of reducing carbon emissions. Thirdly, respondents used discursive features to justify an unsustainable action they perform or a sustainable action they cannot take. These findings have implications for wording used in environmental campaigns.
Keywords: carbon footprint
discourse analysis
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/4937
Appears in Collections:Psychology Undergraduate thesis collection

Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © The University of Edinburgh 2013, and/or the original authors. Privacy and Cookies Policy