Show simple item record

BMC Public Health

dc.contributor.authorRichardson, E.
dc.contributor.authorPearce, J.
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, R.
dc.contributor.authorDay, P.
dc.contributor.authorKingham, S.
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-10T15:22:33Z
dc.date.available2010-12-10T15:22:33Z
dc.date.issued2010-05
dc.identifier.issnNAen
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/240/abstract/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1842/4445
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is mounting international evidence that exposure to green environments is associated with health benefits, including lower mortality rates. Consequently, it has been suggested that the uneven distribution of such environments may contribute to health inequalities. Possible causative mechanisms behind the green space and health relationship include the provision of physical activity opportunities, facilitation of social contact and the restorative effects of nature. In the New Zealand context we investigated whether there was a socioeconomic gradient in green space exposure and whether green space exposure was associated with cause-specific mortality (cardiovascular disease and lung cancer). We subsequently asked what is the mechanism(s) by which green space availability may influence mortality outcomes, by contrasting health associations for different types of green space. Methods: This was an observational study on a population of 1,546,405 living in 1009 small urban areas in New Zealand. A neighbourhood-level classification was developed to distinguish between usable (i.e., visitable) and non-usable green space (i.e., visible but not visitable) in the urban areas. Negative binomial regression models were fitted to examine the association between quartiles of area-level green space availability and risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease (n = 9,484; 1996 - 2005) and from lung cancer (n = 2,603; 1996 - 2005), after control for age, sex, socio-economic deprivation, smoking, air pollution and population density. Results: Deprived neighbourhoods were relatively disadvantaged in total green space availability (11% less total green space for a one standard deviation increase in NZDep2001 deprivation score, p < 0.001), but had marginally more usable green space (2% more for a one standard deviation increase in deprivation score, p = 0.002). No significant associations between usable or total green space and mortality were observed after adjustment for confounders. Conclusion: Contrary to expectations we found no evidence that green space influenced cardiovascular disease mortality in New Zealand, suggesting that green space and health relationships may vary according to national, societal or environmental context. Hence we were unable to infer the mechanism in the relationship. Our inability to adjust for individual-level factors with a significant influence on cardiovascular disease and lung cancer mortality risk (e. g., diet and alcohol consumption) will have limited the ability of the analyses to detect green space effects, if present. Additionally, green space variation may have lesser relevance for health in New Zealand because green space is generally more abundant and there is less social and spatial variation in its availability than found in other contexts.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.titleThe association between green space and cause-specific mortality in urban New Zealand: an ecological analysis of green space utilityen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-10-240en
rps.issueNAen
rps.volume10en
rps.titleBMC Public Healthen
dc.date.updated2010-12-10T15:22:33Z
dc.identifier.eIssn1471-2458en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record