Information Services banner Edinburgh Research Archive The University of Edinburgh crest

Edinburgh Research Archive >
Business School >
Entrepreneurship and Innovation Group >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

This item has been viewed 47 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Technology Choice and its Performance 11th October.pdf185.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Technology choice and its performance: Towards a sociology of software package procurement
Authors: Williams, R.
Pollock, N
Issue Date: 27-Jun-2007
Citation: Williams, R., Pollock, N. (2007-06-27) Technology choice and its performance: Towards a sociology of software package procurement, Information and Organization 131-161
Abstract: Technology Acquisition is an important but neglected issue within the social science analysis of technology. The limited number of studies undertaken reproduce a schism between rationalist (e.g., economic) forms of analysis, where the assumption is that choice is the outcome of formal assessment, and cultural sociological approaches which see choice as driven by the micro-politics of the organisational setting, interests, prevalent rhetorics, fads, etc. While sympathetic to the latter critical view, we are dissatisfied with the relativist portrayal of technology selection: that decisions, beset with uncertainties and tensions, are divorced from formal decision making criteria. Influenced by Michel Callon’s writing on the ‘performativity’ of economic concepts and tools, we argue that formal assessment has a stronger relationship to technology decisions than suggested by cultural sociologists. We focus on a procurement which is characterised by high levels of organisational tension and where there is deep uncertainty about each of the solutions on offer. We show how the procurement team are able to arrive at a decision through laboriously constructing a ‘comparison’. That is, they attempt to drag the choice from the informal domain onto a more formal, accountable plane through the mobilisation and performance of a number of ‘comparative measures’ and criteria. These measures constituted a stabilised form of accountability, which we describe through the metaphor of a ‘scaffolding’, erected in the course of the procurement. Our argument is threefold: first, we argue that comparisons are possible but that they require much effort; second, that it is not the properties of the technology which determines choice but the way these properties were given form through the various comparative measures put in place; and finally whilst comparative measures might be imposed by one group upon others in a procurement team, these measures remain relatively malleable.
Keywords: Procurement
URI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2007.05.001
ISSN: 1471-7727
Appears in Collections:Entrepreneurship and Innovation Group

Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © The University of Edinburgh 2013, and/or the original authors. Privacy and Cookies Policy