Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFoster, Paul
dc.contributor.advisorBond, Helen
dc.contributor.authorRybka, Wojciech Pawel
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-01T14:31:50Z
dc.date.available2017-12-01T14:31:50Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-27
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1842/25749
dc.description.abstractThe thesis collects and analyses the very first (2nd-5th century) clear quotations, references and interpretations of Acts 15:20.29 and Acts 21:25. It consists of three parts: Part I, which is introductory in nature, presents and comments upon the textual variants of these biblical verses. Part II catalogues and analyses all the relevant texts referring to and commenting on Acts 15:20.29 and Acts 21:25. The purpose is to discover each ancient author’s understanding of the Jerusalem Council’s prohibitions, enumerated in the above verses of Acts. The writers and their texts are divided into three groups depending on which main textual variant of Acts 15:20.29 and Acts 21:25 they referred or quote. Part III presents in its first two chapters a synthesis of the above analyses, juxtaposing and summarizing early authors’ views on the meaning and normativity of the prohibitions. Then, the last chapter examines the potential influence of a variant of Acts 15:20.29 and 21:25 quoted or referred to (or preferred if more variants were known to a given author) by the writers on their understanding of the prohibitions. The thesis shows that despite different textual variants used by the early writers, their interpretations of the prohibitions, although often superficially different, have in a number of cases and on a deeper level more in common than one would preliminarily surmise.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherThe University of Edinburghen
dc.subjectActs of the Apostlesen
dc.subjectJerusalem Councilen
dc.subjecttextual variantsen
dc.subjectinterpretationen
dc.subjectexegesisen
dc.titleMeaning and normativity of Jerusalem Council’s prohibitions in relation to textual variants of Acts 15:20.29 and Acts 21:25. An analysis and comparison of early interpretations (2nd-5th Century)en
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen
dcterms.accessRightsRestricted Accessen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record