Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorStenning, Keith
dc.contributor.advisorOberlander, Jon
dc.contributor.authorHughson, Stuart Ian
dc.date.accessioned2007-08-23T13:17:44Z
dc.date.available2007-08-23T13:17:44Z
dc.date.issued2007-06-26
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1842/1907
dc.descriptionInstitute for Communicating and Collaborative Systems
dc.description.abstractIn the century or so that syllogisms have received the attention of psychologists, their interpretation both as and within particular types of discourse has been largely downplayed. A significant element in the guidance of interpretation is information structure as expressed in prosody. This thesis explores the role of intonation in syllogistic discourse and its effect on reasoning. A theoretical analysis of the information structures of syllogisms is presented which produces two classes of intonation patterns, the 'contextually concordant' (CC) and the 'contextually neutral' (CN), putatively corresponding to two discourse types. These are then investigated in a series of experiments. The initial observational study aims at confirming the use and significance of CC and CN patterns in a syllogism solving task. The remaining two experiments employ a purpose-built voice synthesiser to investigate the effects of imposing CC and CN contours on premises, first in a syllogism solving task and then in a syllogism evaluation task. The results show that both CC and CN intonation patterns are indeed used by participants and bear a systematic relationship to both the number and accuracy of conclusions they draw. When used in the presentation of syllogisms, however, these patterns do not influence the production of conclusions, only the evaluation of them. It is therefore argued that the discourse types to which they relate depend upon whether the syllogism is interpreted as a proof or as a problem. Further work based on these findings could aim to probe the informational links between conclusions and premises and thereby elucidate the coherence of arguments.en
dc.contributor.sponsorEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en
dc.format.extent722708 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectinformation structureen
dc.subjectintonationen
dc.subjectreasoningen
dc.subjectsyllogismen
dc.subjectdiscourseen
dc.subjectargumenten
dc.titlePitching an Argument: Intonation, information, and inference in syllogistic discourseen
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record