Information Services banner Edinburgh Research Archive The University of Edinburgh crest

Edinburgh Research Archive >
Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of >
Philosophy >
Philosophy research publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1353

This item has been viewed 30 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
blackburns.ruling.passions.a4.pdf123.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Blackburn's Ruling Passions: A Partial Reply
Authors: Pollard, Bill
Issue Date: 1998
Citation: 'Blackburn's Ruling Passions: A Partial Reply', Philosophical Writings, 9, 1998, pp. 49-64.
Publisher: University of Durham Department of Philosophy
Abstract: Ruling Passions is Simon Blackburn’s latest attempt to defend a theory of practical reason which he calls “expressivism”.2 In the first three chapters Blackburn outlines an account of how we should understand statements of right, good and virtue, as well as their negative counterparts (“the Ethical [or Moral] Proposition”, as he terms this amalgam). This he calls “quasi-realism”. I shall describe what this position entails in the first section. Secondly I shall consider the opposition to this view advanced by McDowell (1987), who in turn takes his inspiration from Wiggins (1976a, 1976b). Finally I shall assess Blackburn’s reply to McDowell and Wiggins (found in Chapter 4 of RP), and argue that it is inadequate.
Keywords: philosophy
blackburn
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1353
ISSN: 1361-9365
Appears in Collections:Philosophy research publications

Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © The University of Edinburgh 2013, and/or the original authors. Privacy and Cookies Policy