Information Services banner Edinburgh Research Archive The University of Edinburgh crest

Edinburgh Research Archive >
Centre for Speech Technology Research >
CSTR publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1173

This item has been viewed 26 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
SC_29.pdf3.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Improving the performance of a Dutch CSR by modeling within-word and cross-word pronunciation variation
Authors: Kessens, Judith M
Wester, Mirjam
Strik, Helmer
Issue Date: 1999
Citation: Speech Communication, 29:193-207, 1999.
Publisher: Elsevier
Abstract: This article describes how the performance of a Dutch continuous speech recognizer was improved by modeling pronunciation variation. We propose a general procedure for modeling pronunciation variation. In short, it consists of adding pronunciation variants to the lexicon, retraining phone models and using language models to which the pronunciation variants have been added. First, within-word pronunciation variants were generated by applying a set of five optional phonological rules to the words in the baseline lexicon. Next, a limited number of cross-word processes were modeled, using two different methods. In the first approach, cross-word processes were modeled by directly adding the cross-word variants to the lexicon, and in the second approach this was done by using multi-words. Finally, the combination of the within-word method with the two cross-word methods was tested. The word error rate (WER) measured for the baseline system was 12.75%. Compared to the baseline, a small but statistically significant improvement of 0.68% in WER was measured for the within-word method, whereas both cross-word methods in isolation led to small, non-signicant improvements. The combination of the within-word method and cross-word method 2 led to the best result: an absolute improvement of 1.12% in WER was found compared to the baseline, which is a relative improvement of 8.8% in WER.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1173
Appears in Collections:CSTR publications

Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © The University of Edinburgh 2013, and/or the original authors. Privacy and Cookies Policy