Information Services banner Edinburgh Research Archive The University of Edinburgh crest

Edinburgh Research Archive >
Centre for Speech Technology Research >
CSTR publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1125

This item has been viewed 16 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Williams_1994_a.pdf88.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Welsh letter-to-sound rules: rewrite rules and two-level rules compared
Authors: Williams, Briony
Issue Date: Jul-1994
Citation: Computer Speech and Language (1994) 8, 261-277
Publisher: Elsevier
Abstract: In a text-to-speech synthesis system, input words not found in the system's lexicon are passed to letter-to-sound rules, which derive the word's pronunciation. In Welsh, the letter-to-sound rules must be applied in three passes; firstly, to add epenthetic vowels, secondly, to determine stress and vowel location, and thirdly, to perform grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. To begin with, all these letter-to-sound rules were written in the form of context-sensitive rewrite rules, and were evaluated, giving a 96% success rate. The rules for the second pass were then rewritten in the form of two-level rules, using the PCKIMMO software package. The output was identical to that produced by the second block of rewrite rules. The two-level formalism had advantages in simplifying rules. However, there were difficulties due to the need to force the rules to operate in a deterministic fashion. In a practical text-to-speech system, the rewrite rule formalism would be favoured, despite the greater number of rules and their greater clumsiness, since the critical ordering of rewrite rules easily introduces the necessary determinism.
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/csla.1994.1014
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1125
ISSN: 0885-2308
Appears in Collections:CSTR publications

Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © The University of Edinburgh 2013, and/or the original authors. Privacy and Cookies Policy