|dc.description.abstract||Phonemic perception exhibits coarticulation sensitivity, phonotactic sensitivity and lexical
sensitivity. Three kinds of models of speech perception are found in the literature, which
embody different answers to the question of how the three kinds of sensitivity are related to
each other: two-step models, one-step models and lexicalist models.
In two-step models (Church, 1987), phonemes are first extracted, and phonotactic repairs
are subsequently made on the obtained phoneme string; both phonemic categorization and
phonotactic repair are sublexical, and coarticulation sensitivity should only affect initial (prephonotactic)
In one-step models (Dehaene-Lambertz et al., 2000; Dupoux et al., 2011; Mehler et al.,
1990), phonemic categorization and phonotactic repair are sublexical and simultaneous; phonotactic
repairs themselves depend on coarticulation cues. Such models can be implemented
in two different versions: suprasegmental matching, according to which a speech signal is
matched against phonotactics-respecting suprasegmental units (such as syllables), rather than
phonemes, and slot filling, according to which a speech signal is matched against phonemes as
fillers for slots in phonotactics-respecting suprasegmental units.
In lexicalist models (Cutler et al., 2009; McClelland & Elman, 1986), coarticulation sensitivity
and/or phonotactic sensitivity reduce to lexical sensitivity. McClelland & Elman (1986)
claim a lexicalist reduction of phonotactic sensitivity; Cutler et al.’s (2009) make a claim implying
lexicalist reductions both of phonotactic sensitivity and of coarticulation sensitivity.
This thesis attempts to distinguish among those models. Since different perceptual processes
are assumed in these three models (whether sublexical units are perceived, or how many
stages are involved in perceptual processing), our understanding of how speech perception
works crucially depends on the relative superiority of those three kinds of models.
Based on the results available in the past literature on the one hand, and on the results of perceptual
experiments with Japanese listeners testing their coarticulation sensitivity in different
settings on the other, this thesis argues for the superiority of the slot filling version of one-step
models over the others. According to this conclusion, phonemic parsing (categorization) and
phonotactic parsing (repair) are separate but parallel sublexical processes.||en_US