Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKessens, Judith M
dc.contributor.authorWester, Mirjam
dc.contributor.authorCucchiarini, Catia
dc.contributor.authorStrik, Helmer
dc.coverage.spatial4en
dc.date.accessioned2006-05-11T16:54:17Z
dc.date.available2006-05-11T16:54:17Z
dc.date.issued1998-12
dc.identifier.citationIn ICSLP-1998, paper 0372.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.isca-speech.org/archive/icslp_1998/index.html
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1842/1023
dc.description.abstractIn this paper the performance of an automatic transcription tool is evaluated. The transcription tool is a Continuous Speech Recognizer (CSR) running in forced recognition mode. For evaluation the performance of the CSR was compared to that of nine expert listeners. Both man and the machine carried out exactly the same task: deciding whether a segment was present or not in 467 cases. It turned out that the performance of the CSR is comparable to that of the experts.en
dc.format.extent95980 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInternational Speech Communication Associationen
dc.titleThe Selection of Pronunciation Variants: Comparing the Performance of Man and Machineen
dc.typeConference Paperen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record