Information Services banner Edinburgh Research Archive The University of Edinburgh crest

Edinburgh Research Archive >
Centre for Speech Technology Research >
CSTR publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/975

This item has been viewed 5 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
p339-stolcke.pdf2.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech
Authors: Stolcke, Andreas
Coccaro, Noah
Bates, Rebecca
Taylor, Paul
Van Ess-Dykema, Carol
Ries, Klaus
Shriberg, Elizabeth
Jurafsky, Daniel
Martin, Rachel
Meteer, Marie
Issue Date: Sep-2000
Citation: Computational Linguistics 26(3) 339-373, 2000.
Publisher: MIT Press
Abstract: We describe a statistical approach for modeling dialogue acts in conversational speech, i.e., speech-act-like units such as STATEMENT, QUESTION, BACKCHANNEL, AGREEMENT, DISAGREEMENT, and APOLOGY. Our model detects and predicts dialogue acts based on lexical, collocational, and prosodic cues, as well as on the discourse coherence of the dialogue act sequence. The dialogue model is based on treating the discourse structure of a conversation as a hidden Markov model and the individual dialogue acts as observations emanating from the model states. Constraints on the likely sequence of dialogue acts are modeled via a dialogue act n-gram. The statistical dialogue grammar is combined with word n-grams, decision trees, and neural networks modeling the idiosyncratic lexical and prosodic manifestations of each dialogue act. We develop a probabilistic integration of speech recognition with dialogue modeling, to improve both speech recognition and dialogue act classification accuracy. Models are trained and evaluated using a large hand-labeled database of 1,155 conversations from the Switchboard corpus of spontaneous human-to-human telephone speech. We achieved good dialogue act labeling accuracy (65% based on errorful, automatically recognized words and prosody, and 71% based on word transcripts, compared to a chance baseline accuracy of 35% and human accuracy of 84%) and a small reduction in word recognition error.
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089120100561737
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/975
ISSN: 0891-2017
Appears in Collections:CSTR publications

Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © The University of Edinburgh 2013, and/or the original authors. Privacy and Cookies Policy