Edinburgh Research Archive >
Clinical Sciences, School of >
School of Clinical Sciences thesis and dissertation collection >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Creating smoke-free environments: public and private places|
|Authors: ||Ritchie, Deborah Doreen|
|Issue Date: ||26-Jun-2012|
|Publisher: ||The University of Edinburgh|
|Abstract: ||The purpose of the critical review is understood to be a critical reflection and
comment on the work presented in the papers. The critical review is centred on the
papers, as they form the substance of the submission, and the wider tobacco control
literature. This review has not attempted to re-analyse the findings of the studies but
attempts to draw wider lessons from the studies and to contribute to the future
implementation of tobacco control policy and programmes. It will be claimed that the
contribution to the research studies, the publications and the critical review
represents a significant body of work and contribution to the advancement of
knowledge in tobacco control.
The aim of the thesis is to present and critically review six publications on the social
de-normalisation of tobacco use, as it relates to public and private smoke-free
environments and professional engagement in Scotland. The publications are treated
as a coherent body of tobacco control research and draw upon three studies
conducted over the period 1999-2007.
Breathing Space Study 1: 1999-2002 evaluated an intervention which aimed to
produce a significant shift in community norms towards non-smoking in a lowincome
area. A process evaluation, as part of a quasi-experimental design, was
undertaken in the intervention area, using a range of qualitative methods, including
observation, in-depth interviews and focus groups. Papers 1 and 2 explore the
context of health promotion professional practice in the development and
implementation of tobacco control interventions in one disadvantaged community.
The Qualitative Community Study 2: 2005-2007 aimed to explore the impact of the
Scottish smoke-free legislation on attitudes and behaviour, at both individual and
community levels, in four socio-economically contrasting localities in Scotland. A
longitudinal qualitative evaluation was conducted using observation, in-depth
interviews with smokers and ex-smokers, key stakeholders and focus groups. Papers
3 and 4 explore qualitative differences in the experience of smoke-free legislation in
advantaged and disadvantaged communities, with particular consideration of the
unintended consequences of the legislation for some smokers.
The Smoke-free Homes Study 3: 2006-2007 aimed to describe changes in smoking
behaviour and attitudes to smoking following implementation of the smoke-free
legislation. It sought to identify the potential enablers and barriers to reducing SHS
exposure in the home. A cross-sectional study was conducted using qualitative
interviews. Papers 5 and 6 explore the changing discourses about second-hand
smoke exposure, and the development of smoking restrictions in the home, with a
particular focus on motivation to protect children. In addition, insight into the
changing culture of professional practice in creating smoke-free homes was gained.
Key findings A synthesis of key findings from these publications supports the
identification of three major themes: the experience of power at each stage of the
process of the social de-normalisation of tobacco use; the experience of stigmatisation of smoking as a consequence of policy; and health promotion practice
as both barrier to and enabler of the implementation of smoke-free environments in
the community and the home. The thesis also highlights the benefits and challenges
of two research methodologies, process evaluation and qualitative longitudinal
research (QLLR), in capturing both intended and unanticipated aspects of policy and
practice implementation. This synthesis of the key findings that cut across the three
studies has generated four research questions that are explored in this critical review:
1. How can policy be evaluated in community settings and in the home?
2. How do smokers, particularly disadvantaged smokers, engage with tobacco
control policies and interventions?
3. Is professional practice a barrier or facilitator to understanding the impact of
tobacco control policies and interventions?
4. What are some of the key unintended consequences of recent tobacco control
Conclusion This thesis contributes to knowledge through a critical account of the reshaping
of smoking as a collective lifestyle, in both public and private domains. The
social de-normalisation of tobacco use is experienced differently in advantaged and
disadvantaged social contexts. Population tobacco control strategies may benefit
from contextual adjustments, particularly for those smokers who live in areas of
disadvantage and thus experience dual stigmatisation. Additionally, the effectiveness
of future interventions would be enhanced by a more nuanced understanding of
smoking behaviour, as a collective social practice, embedded in specific spaces,
places and times.|
|Keywords: ||tobacco control|
|Appears in Collections:||School of Clinical Sciences thesis and dissertation collection|
Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.