Information Services banner Edinburgh Research Archive The University of Edinburgh crest

Edinburgh Research Archive >
Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of >
Psychology >
Psychology Undergraduate thesis collection >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6142

This item has been viewed 20 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Byrne 2011 MA.docMain Article165 kBMicrosoft Word
Title: Use of Language in the Construction of Opionions on Immigration: The Presence of a Generation Gap?
Authors: Byrne, Agnes
Supervisor(s): Widdicombe, Sue
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: The University of Edinburgh
Abstract: This thesis aimed to observe people’s use of language when constructing views on immigrants. This was done by collecting people’s opinions on immigration using a one-to-one semi-structured interview technique. This study used discourse analysis to examine the use of linguistic techniques in language when constructing opinions on immigrants. This thesis adopted an additional approach by comparing two generations’ use of language when constructing opinions on immigration, to determine similarities or differences in their techniques. Examination of the interview transcripts was conducted using discourse analysis, which is most related to that used in discursive psychology (Potter & Edwards, 2001). From this, three themes were observed and the linguistic features used to construct these themes were identified. The first theme identified was playing down prejudice, and the use of the word just, modification and distancing self were all identified as linguistic techniques used in constructing this theme. The second theme was the prioritisation of the host country, and repetition, justification and presenting their opinions as imperatives were linguistic features used to construct this theme. The third theme was presenting immigrants negatively and the linguistic features present were stereotypical attributes and use of quantification. To compare the two generations’ use of language when constructing their views on immigration, responses to the question “in terms of prejudice views on immigrant groups, do you think that young people (like yourself) hold different views than older people (such as your grandparents)?” were analysed. This research observed no generation difference in the use of language to construct opinions on immigrants. The study concluded that through their use of language, when constructing views on immigrants, people are keen to play down or justify any prejudiced remarks or beliefs made in their speech.
Keywords: Immigration
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6142
Appears in Collections:Psychology Undergraduate thesis collection

Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback