Edinburgh Research Archive >
Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of >
Philosophy PhD thesis collection >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Three perspectives on the ethics of immigration: utilitarian, liberal egalitarian and libertarian|
|Authors: ||Todea, Virginia Diana|
|Supervisor(s): ||Brown, Campbell|
|Issue Date: ||24-Nov-2010|
|Publisher: ||The University of Edinburgh|
|Abstract: ||The focal point of this dissertation is the recent discussion on the ethics of
immigration. The main question considered is: “Should a state promote immigration?”
Promoting immigration means allowing immigrants to enter inside and also
offering them rights in view of treating them properly in the course of integration
within the host communities. In answering this question, three perspectives are critically
examined: utilitarian, liberal egalitarian and libertarian.
In the first chapter I assess the utilitarian arguments on immigration and
weigh the objections related to them. The core of this chapter represents the analysis
of the consequences of immigration on the following categories: immigrants, native
workers, home and host countries, with implications on issues such as national culture,
labor market, entrepreneurship, capital flight, remittances and brain drain.
In the second chapter, I discuss the liberal egalitarian arguments concerning
immigration, the difficulties met in promoting the symmetry between the right of exit
and right of entry. Issues discussed in this chapter include freedom of movement,
asymmetry between exit and entry, and the cosmopolitan account of open borders.
In the third chapter I present the libertarian position on immigration, reveal
the gaps in the argumentation and the inconsistency of promoting closed borders
within this framework. The main problems reveal a discussion on self-ownership and
freedom maximization, the conflict between the collective consent and the individual’s
decision in the case of immigration.
The final conclusion argues that the moral principles presented so far for each
framework can make us sustain open borders and promote immigration, even in the
real world situations where immigration may have some negative effects.|
|Appears in Collections:||Philosophy PhD thesis collection|
Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.