Edinburgh Research Archive >
Social and Political Sciences, School of >
Centre of African Studies >
Centre of African Studies thesis and dissertation collection >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Technicalities of doing good: NGOs and the administration of civil society in Namibia|
|Authors: ||Höhn, Sabine|
|Supervisor(s): ||Kelly, Tobias|
Dorman, Sara Rich
|Issue Date: ||26-Nov-2010|
|Publisher: ||The University of Edinburgh|
|Abstract: ||The thesis analyses how NGOs define the meaning of civil society in Namibia
through their everyday work. Based on 12 months fieldwork at the national umbrella
for NGOs the thesis shows that this definition was mainly shaped by NGOs’
administration of the everyday rather than the outcome of ideological debates about
how to “do good”. The thesis examines how dominant NGO practices reflect the basic
tension between NGOs’ activists claims and the bureaucratic reality of their work and
in doing so speaks to debates about NGO agency, accountability and their relevance
The thesis shows how organisations use formal criteria in reporting,
networking, advocacy, fundraising and branding to continuously redefine what
activism ought to be about and how “proper” civic organisations ought to behave.
NGOs write reports to enhance their accountability and transparency, but the correct
reporting form also delineates what counts as proper civic activism. They present
networking as civil society’s main coordinating mechanism, but meetings always call
for more coordination and hence additional meetings. Advocacy does not only
concern the relations between civic organisations and the government, but NGOs also
use these relations to justify surveillance and control within civil society. Competitive
fundraising does not blindly follow donors’ demands, rather, through it NGOs create a
canon of fundable and thus legitimate projects.
Finally, the branding of civic activism is not simply concerned with the
promotion of civil society organisations, but is seen as an attempt to create a unified
corporate image with a sharp distinction between proper and improper civic activism.
Struggles over meaning are therefore shifted into contestations around technicalities.
The administration of the everyday in civil society thus becomes the prime means to
decide how to “do good”.|
|Sponsor(s): ||Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)|
Tweedie Exploration Fellowship
University of Edinburgh, College of Humanities and Social Sciences
|Appears in Collections:||Centre of African Studies thesis and dissertation collection|
Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.