|
Edinburgh Research Archive >
Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of >
Psychology >
Psychology Undergraduate thesis collection >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/4933
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format |
Kirsten Graham_Dissertation 2010.doc | only available to ed.ac.uk | 289 kB | Microsoft Word | |
|
| Title: | The relationship between heuristic and algorithmic processing in sentence comprehension. |
| Authors: | Graham, Kirsten |
| Supervisor(s): | Sturt, Patrick |
| Issue Date: | 30-Jun-2010 |
| Publisher: | The University of Edinburgh |
| Abstract: | In a word-by-word, self-paced reading experiment, we examined the effect of voice and plausibility on reading time, as well as accuracy and reaction time to a comprehension question. The effect of the interaction of verbal IQ with these factors was also explored, and comparisons were made between trials interpreted correctly and incorrectly. A linear mixed effects regression (LMER) analysis showed that performance was impaired in all three measures in response to an implausible sentence, but voice only had an effect in offline measures. A higher verbal IQ lessened participants’ susceptibility to the effects of implausibility. In trials where participants misinterpreted the sentence, implausibility had no effect on reading time, whereas participants slowed down in response to implausibility in correctly interpreted sentences. In contrast, slower reaction times were observed in misinterpreted trials than in correctly answered ones. We discuss these results in terms of algorithmic and heuristic processing, and compare our findings with Townsend and Bever’s (2001) LAST. Suggestions for further research are also made. |
| Keywords: | heuristic processing sentence comprehension |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/4933 |
| Appears in Collections: | Psychology Undergraduate thesis collection
|
Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|