|
|
Edinburgh Research Archive >
Social and Political Sciences, School of >
Politics >
Politics publications >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/490
|
| Title: | Democrats and Donors: Studying Democratization in Africa |
| Authors: | Dorman, Sara Rich |
| Editors: | Kelsall, Tim Igoe, Jim |
| Issue Date: | 2004 |
| Citation: | "Democrats and Donors: Studying Democratization in Africa" in Donors, NGOs, and the Liberal Agenda in Africa Tim Kelsall and Jim Igoe, eds. Forthcoming Carolina Academic Press 2004. |
| Publisher: | Carolina Academic Press |
| Abstract: | Since the late 1980s, political scientists, donors, and development workers in East and
Southern Africa have devoted much time and resources to the question of ‘democratization’.
Yet, it is not clear how this concept of ‘democratization’ has helped us to understand African
politics or if donor support for ‘democratization’ has been successful. There are both
methodological and conceptual problems with the way democratization is used to explain
processes as varied as the de-racialization of South Africa, the post-civil war effort to rebuild
Mozambique, and the different patterns of change to multi-party politics in Kenya, Zambia
and Malawi.
Many accounts of these processes of democratizations are ahistorical, or
decontextualised from the historical and cultural situations. Secondly, institutions which are
thought to enable democratizations – like churches and NGOs – are poorly understood and
little studied. Assumptions, rather than empirical evidence, dominate. Such partial
understandings of the societies and institutions under observation leads to inappropriate
policy responses by bilateral and multi-lateral donors eager to support ‘democratization’.
In this paper, I explore the ways in which the development industry has adopted and
used political science concepts of ‘democratization’ and ‘civil society’ and the problems
inherent with this process. I focus on the role of local or ‘indigenous’ NGOs as recipients of
donor aid and potential agents of democratization. In order to understand why NGOs are
assumed to contribute to a process of ‘democratization’ we need to examine both what
donors think NGOs are, and their relationship with the state, as well as how this plays out in
practice. In particular, we need to examine the changes that have resulted from the increased
resources made available to the NGO sector. A case study of a prominent Zimbabwean
Human Rights NGO, ZimRights, will be used to illustrate the problems caused by growth and
expansion. First however, I want to examine the methodology and conceptualization of
‘democracy’ as used by donors. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/490 |
| Appears in Collections: | Politics publications Politics publications
|
Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|