|
Edinburgh Research Archive >
Molecular, Genetic and Population Health Sciences, School of >
Molecular, Genetic and Population Health Sciences thesis and dissertation collection >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/4824
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format |
Sena2010.doc | one year restriction | 30.17 MB | Microsoft Word | | Sena2010.pdf | one year restriction | 11.03 MB | Adobe PDF | | Appendix 4.pdf | one year restriction | 34.01 kB | Adobe PDF | |
|
| Title: | Systematic review and meta-analysis of animal models of acute ischaemic stroke |
| Authors: | Sena, Emily Shamiso |
| Supervisor(s): | Macleod, Malcolm Howells, David |
| Issue Date: | 2010 |
| Publisher: | The University of Edinburgh |
| Abstract: | Ischaemic stroke is responsible for substantial death and disability and creates a huge
financial burden for healthcare budgets worldwide. At present there are few effective
treatments for acute stroke and these are urgently required. Increased understanding of the
ischaemic cascade has generated interest in neuroprotection for focal cerebral ischaemia.
However, treatment effects observed in of over 500 interventions in animal models have yet
to be translated to the clinic. Systematic review and meta-analysis allows unbiased
identification of all relevant data for a given intervention, gives a clearer view of its true
efficacy and the limitations to its therapeutic potential. Understanding the reasons for this
bench-to-bedside failure and providing quantitative explanations may help to address these
discrepancies.
Random effects weighted mean difference meta-analysis of six interventions (tirilazad, tPA,
NXY-059, Hypothermia, Piracetam and IL1-RA) reported study quality to be consistently
low. In some instances, potential sources of bias were associated with overestimations of
efficacy. Likewise, clinical trials have tested interventions in conditions where efficacy was
not observed in animals. Cumulative meta-analysis suggests that for tPA the estimate of
efficacy is stable after the inclusion of data from 1500 animals; hypothermia and FK506 are
the only other interventions to have been tested in at least 1500 animals. Meta-regression
suggests biological rather methodical factors are better predictors of outcome; a major
limitation of these data is the impact of publication bias, and this work suggests effect sizes
from met-analyses are inflated by about 31% because 16% of studies remain unpublished.
The systematic review and meta-analysis of hypothermia was used to plan experiments
investigating the possible impact of pethidine, a drug used to prevent shivering. This in vivo
experiment, in which potential sources of bias were minimised, suggests that pethidine does
not influence the observed efficacy of hypothermia in an animal model of ischaemic stroke.
This thesis reports that animal studies of ischaemic stroke are often not conducted with
sufficient rigour. Both minimising potential sources of bias in individual experiments and
using meta-analysis to summarise data from a number of experiments may be helpful in
improving the translation of neuroprotective efficacy in ischaemic stroke. |
| Sponsor(s): | University of Edinburgh Medicine and Veterinary Medicine PhD Scholarship IBRO World Congress 2007 Travel Grant |
| Keywords: | meta-analysis stroke animal models |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/4824 |
| Appears in Collections: | Molecular, Genetic and Population Health Sciences thesis and dissertation collection
|
Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|