Information Services banner Edinburgh Research Archive The University of Edinburgh crest

Edinburgh Research Archive >
Engineering, School of >
Membrane Technology Research Group >
Membrane Technology Research Group publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/4308

This item has been viewed 126 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
J35 ERA.pdf534.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Fate of Steroid Estrogens in Australian Inland and Coastal Wastewater Treatment Plants
Authors: Braga, Olga
Smythe, George A.
Schäfer, Andrea
Feitz, Andrew J.
Issue Date: 2005
Citation: Braga, O. ; Smythe, G.A. ; Schäfer, A.I. ; Feitz, A.J. (2005) Fate of steroid estrogens in Australian inland and coastal wastewater treatment plants, Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 3351-3358. PLUS CORRECTION: Environmental Science & Technology 39 (18): 7344-7344
Publisher: American Chemical Society
Abstract: A comparison of estrone (E1), 17b-estradiol (E2) and 17a-ethinylestradiol (EE2) removal at a coastal enhanced primary and inland advanced sewage treatment plant (STP) is reported. The average concentration of estrogens in the raw sewage is similar to reports in other studies. The sequential batch reactor at the advanced STP removed on average 85% of the incoming E1 and 96% of the E2. Further removal was observed during later microfiltration with the estrogen concentration below detection (<0.1 ng.L-1) after reverse osmosis. Some 6% of the influent E1+E2 was removed in the waste activated sludge. The detection of EE2 in the waste activated sludge (0.42 ng.g-1 solids dry weight), undetectable in the raw sewage, suggests that EE2 is resistant to biological treatment in the sequential batch reactor and is primarily removed due to sorption. Little estrogen removal was observed at the enhanced primary with only 7% of E1 and 0% of E2 removed. Low removal is expected based on the degree of estrogens partitioning in the organic fraction given the relatively low solids concentration, but surprisingly, some 43% of E2, 24% of E1 and 100% of EE2 remains associated with the solids fraction in the treated effluent. Further research is necessary to determine whether the low level of estrogen removal for the coastal treatment plant will adversely affect the receiving marine environment.
Keywords: Microfiltration
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0501767
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/4308
Appears in Collections:Membrane Technology Research Group publications
Engineering publications

Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback