Information Services banner Edinburgh Research Archive The University of Edinburgh crest

Edinburgh Research Archive >
Divinity, School of >
Divinity thesis and dissertation collection >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/3476

This item has been viewed 137 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Rumple2008.pdfFile not available to download4.89 MBAdobe PDF
Rumple 2008 fonts.zipFile not available to download10.14 MBUnknown
Rumple 2008 Word files.zipFile not available to download6.45 MBUnknown
Title: Take up the cross (Mark 8 : 34 and par.) : the history and function of the cross saying in earliest Christianity
Authors: Rumple, John Glenn
Supervisor(s): Bond, Helen
Issue Date: Jul-2008
Publisher: The University of Edinburgh
Abstract: The principal contention of this thesis is that the earliest Christians viewed the crucifixion of Jesus as paradigmatic for discipleship, confirmation of which can be found in the history and function of a particular saying ascribed to Jesus, namely the ‘cross saying’ (Mk 8:34 and par.). To verify this claim, I explore both the literary tradition and material culture of early Christianity as they relate to the cross saying, explicating the various ways that “taking up the cross” functioned to ensure unwavering loyalty to Jesus. Taking a traditional exegetical approach, I also engage recent work on sapiential literature (mainly Q) and Historical Jesus studies, observing the diverse ways in which the first several generations of Jesus’ followers adapted this saying—both as an aphorism for inclusion in gospels, and in the development of cognate versions useful in more theological settings (e.g., Gal 2:20). Proceeding diachronically via a textual analysis of the cross saying in Q, the Synoptics, and then the Gospel of Thomas, I trace the ways in which the composers of these texts addressed the different social situations of their audiences in an effort to secure commitment to Jesus (or, in the case of Gos. Thom., conformity to his enlightened teachings). Then, turning from the literature to the social and political environment of the New Testament, I note the radical reversal, occurring early in Christian thought, which transformed the crucifixion of Jesus from a shameful social experience into one of honour, and worthy of emulation. Even more significant in terms of current research, I break from the opinions of several New Testament scholars in finding little evidence that the cross saying (presuming it was dominical) functioned as a call to political insurrection. Rather, as evidenced in Christian material culture from the second and third centuries (symbols, the orant prayer posture, making the ‘sign of the cross,’ and so on), the association of crucifixion with discipleship was understood primarily in terms of religious devotion to Jesus.
Keywords: cross
crucifixion
martyrdom
Mark 8:34
discipleship
Jesus
cruciform
suffering
Q
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/3476
Appears in Collections:Divinity thesis and dissertation collection

Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback