|
Edinburgh Research Archive >
Business School >
Entrepreneurship and Innovation Group >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/3249
|
| Title: | Implications of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems for Universities: An Analysis of Benefits and Risks |
| Authors: | Pollock, N. Cornford, J. |
| Issue Date: | 2005 |
| Publisher: | Observatory on Borderless Higher Education |
| Abstract: | Significant changes are occurring in the nature and role of the university as a consequence of
developments in knowledge and ICTs and also as a broader consequence of broader social and
economic transformations. Transformations that have been occurring within higher education
within recent years - for instance, the student population has increased by 40 per cent during the
1990's – are now having important consequences for the organisation, management, and
administration of universities (cf. Scott, 1995; Schuller, 1995). Moreover, with the move to
‘modularity’, credit systems, semesters, auditing and the like, changes have been necessary across
the whole institution (cf. Newby, 1999). Among such changes are increasing pressures for better
management and administration processes and for universities to operate less according to
conventional structures and more as modern, flexible ‘organisations’. Given that universities are
expected to perform many more functions than has traditionally been the case, there are
increasingly strong pressures to develop information systems that can handle the increasingly
complex needs of universities (cf. JISC, 1995). In many cases universities are not building these
systems anew, nor are they acquiring them from the many suppliers who specialise in the higher
education market but, rather, they are turning to, and preferring to modify and customise software
widely used by large corporations, typically Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems.
However, while universities choose these packages because of their economic benefits they are
potentially a costly and high-risk strategy. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/3249 |
| Appears in Collections: | Entrepreneurship and Innovation Group
|
Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|