|
Edinburgh Research Archive >
AHRC Research Centre for Studies in IP and Technology Law >
Phase One >
Implementing European E-Commerce Legislation >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2382
|
| Title: | On-line dispute resolution in cross-border consumer e-commerce transactions: lessons from eBay and ICANN |
| Authors: | Edwards, Lilian Wilson, Caroline |
| Issue Date: | 2007 |
| Citation: | (2007) International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 21, (3), 315-333 |
| Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
| Abstract: | Effective dispute settlement is regarded as one of the means of enhancing consumer confidence in cross-border purchases over the Internet. Yet, studies of online dispute resolution (ODR) show, on the whole, poor uptake of ODR by the public. This paper is based on a research project carried out by the authors (funded by the European Parliament) which explored why so few people resort to ODR and what are the implications of low uptake for consumer confidence in cross-border e-commerce. The authors expand the traditional definition of ODR and introduce a distinction between what they term 'hard' or traditional ODR processes and the more novel 'soft' ODR processes. The low uptake of 'hard' ODR is critically considered, as are the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of 'hard' and 'soft' ODR. Successful examples of one 'hard' and one 'soft' ODR mechanism are reviewed. The authors conclude with considering the implications for EU ODR policy in the short, medium and long term. |
| Sponsor(s): | Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) |
| Keywords: | online dispute resolution consumer confidence |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2382 |
| Appears in Collections: | Implementing European E-Commerce Legislation
|
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|