|
Edinburgh Research Archive >
Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of >
Psychology >
Psychology Undergraduate thesis collection >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2321
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format |
o'donnell dissertation.pdf | only available in ed.ac.uk | 268.4 kB | Adobe PDF | |
|
| Title: | The Role of personality in chat-up line displays |
| Authors: | O'Donnell, David |
| Supervisor(s): | Caryl, Peter |
| Issue Date: | 2006 |
| Abstract: | Recent research has suggested that chat-up lines/verbal relationship initiation
approaches may act as male sexual displays. But what role does personality play in
how individuals rate such approaches? 200 participants (134 females and 66 males)
took part in the self-reported, within-subjects design, which involved completing
Bale, Morrison & Caryl’s (2005) Chat-up Line Questionnaire, as well as Eysenck’s
revised Personality Questionnaire (1994). The research found participants were able
to reliably identify what constitutes a successful chat-up line. Approaches that
displayed positive character traits, as well as cultural knowledge, were rated the
highest. Jokes of a sexual nature and compliments were rated the lowest. Therefore, it
was found that Bale et al.’s (2005) findings were replicated, thus providing further
support for Miller’s (2000) Mating Mind Hypothesis. However, the results were
found to contradict Miller’s (1999) claims regarding humour, as the post-hoc groups
of humour and sex-related humour were also low. Other findings from the chat-up
line data provided support for two other evolutionary theories: Buss and Schmitt’s
(1993) Sexual Strategies Theory and Trivers’ (1972) Parental Investment Theory.
With regards to individual personality differences, the present research found
evidence that high neuroticism and psychoticism scores can affect how an individual
rates particular types of approaches. |
| Keywords: | chat-up lines sexual display personality traits mate choice |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2321 |
| Appears in Collections: | Psychology Undergraduate thesis collection
|
Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|