|
Edinburgh Research Archive >
Divinity, School of >
Divinity thesis and dissertation collection >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2231
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format |
Atkinson WP 07 Word files.zip | Original files are restricted access | 491.28 kB | Zip file | | | Atkinson WP thesis 07.pdf | Open Access version | 3.49 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
|
| Title: | A Theological Appraisal of the Doctrine that Jesus Died Spiritually, as Taught by Kenyon, Hagin and Copeland |
| Authors: | Atkinson, William P |
| Supervisor(s): | Fergusson, David Hurtado, Larry W |
| Issue Date: | 2007 |
| Abstract: | This thesis appraises the doctrine that Jesus ‘died spiritually’ (JDS), as taught by
E. W. Kenyon, Kenneth E. Hagin and Kenneth Copeland: important research because
of the influence of these men and their teaching, not least on Pentecostalism. JDS
teaching originated with Kenyon, was introduced to the Word-faith movement by
Hagin, and continues to be offered by Copeland. However, it has been the subject of
much criticism.
The appraisal conducted in this project is primarily theological. Aspects of JDS
teaching are considered in the light of both the Christian scriptures and the church’s
great thinkers. Theological investigation into Kenyon’s immediate sources is also
conducted. The research finds that the alleged ‘spiritual death’ of Christ incorporates
three major elements: in this ‘death’, Jesus was separated from God; partook of a
sinful, satanic nature; and was Satan’s prey. Jesus had to die thus to atone for human
sin.
The appraisal observes that criticism of JDS teaching offered so far is partially
inaccurate. In particular, the alleged ‘spiritualisation’ of Christ’s death does not owe
its origin to New Thought or Christian Science, as claimed, but is developed by
Kenyon from seeds lying within Higher Life and Faith Cure circles. However, study
of the three main aspects of JDS teaching confirms earlier research that it often
misrepresents the Christian scriptures. Furthermore, it departs significantly from
historic Christian formulations. This particularly applies to the claim that Christ
partook of Satan’s nature.
The project concludes that JDS teaching is not readily compatible with the traditional
trinitarianism, incarnationalism and substitutionary atonement to which it claims to
adhere. Adoption of JDS teaching by Pentecostalism would be damaging in these
doctrinal respects, and thus draw the latter away from its moorings in traditional
Christianity. Pentecostalism is advised to reject the bulk of this teaching. |
| Keywords: | Divinity |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2231 |
| Appears in Collections: | Divinity thesis and dissertation collection
|
Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|