Edinburgh Research Archive >
Information Services >
StORe project >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Project StORe: Astronomy Report|
|Authors: ||Choudhury, Sayeed|
|Issue Date: ||2006|
|Abstract: ||In many ways, digital astronomy is at the forefront of issues related to data curation, given the
existing experience with generating large amounts of data in raw form, and significant quantities
of derived data in processed form. Additionally, astronomers have agreed upon a set of
standards and web services for accessing, organizing and disseminating data. In the United
States, the international Virtual Observatory effort is often cited as the archetypal example for
cyberinfrastructure-related discussions. Astronomy data is “unconstrained” in the sense that it
does not contain the same privacy, legal, commercial, etc. parameters of other scientific
disciplines. This characteristic enables astronomers, and librarians, to build systems in an open
1) Apart from being a condition of use of source repositories, the culture in astronomy is strong
for citing source data in publications. Links from output to source repositories may be more
useful than vice versa. The main value for accessing data in this manner would be value to
the research community, to validate results, to identify specific astronomical objects of
interest, or to identify collaborative opportunities.
2) Researchers are happy for their (source) data to be used as long as it is credited and, where
publicly funded, there is an obligation for it to be made so anyway after a proprietary period
of usually 6 to18 months (during which time data is restricted to project team members).
3) ArXiv.org and NASA-ADS are the main A&I database and output repositories used. The
Virtual Observatory team and Sheridan Libraries at Johns Hopkins are working with the
University of Chicago Press to consider output repository support at the time of article
submission, especially as it supports preservation of derived data cited within publications.
4) There are facilities to link source to output data in operation, e.g. CDS's Simbad but they are
not comprehensive and one interviewee mentioned his work on improving the linking.
5) Source repositories like being able to monitor how much they are used, especially if metrics
for use might help gather additional funding or support.
6) Astronomers should define standard methods to refer to same objects when viewed through
different spectra, including the provenance or annotations with certain data (or analyses of
data) are deposited into output repositories. Additional metadata through automated
mechanisms (e.g., telescope directly records weather conditions) would also be useful.
7) Astronomers would not seek help from librarians or informational professionals with
information seeking or navigating, but rather for assistance with metadata and preservation
matters related to datasets.|
|Keywords: ||Store project|
|Appears in Collections:||StORe project|
Items in ERA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.