<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2030">
    <title>ERA Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2030</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2516" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2515" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2451" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2449" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-06-19T01:17:01Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2516">
    <title>The Right Not to Know: An Autonomy Based Approach – A Response to Andorno</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2516</link>
    <description>Title: The Right Not to Know: An Autonomy Based Approach – A Response to Andorno
Authors: Laurie, Graeme
Abstract: The author comments on the question of a right not to know genetic information, in a response to Dr Adorno.  The article discusses similaries shared between Laurie and Adorno, with the former differentiating his views by focussing on a privacy based approach, as opposed to an autonomy based approach.</description>
    <dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2515">
    <title>Privacy and Property? Multi-level Strategies for Protecting Personal Interests in Genetic Material</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2515</link>
    <description>Title: Privacy and Property? Multi-level Strategies for Protecting Personal Interests in Genetic Material
Authors: Laurie, Graeme
Abstract: The paper builds on earlier medico-legal work by Laurie on privacy in relation to genetic material.  In this chapter, the author discusses not only Laurie's views as 'pro-privacy' but the limitations of privacy, particularly once information, genetic or otherwise, enters a public sphere.  The article draws on cases and laws in the UK, continental Europe, and the US, to provide a comparative view in suggesting an alternative approach to privacy.</description>
    <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2451">
    <title>The Autonomy of Others: Reflections on the Rise and Rise of Patient Choice in Contemporary Medical Law</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2451</link>
    <description>Title: The Autonomy of Others: Reflections on the Rise and Rise of Patient Choice in Contemporary Medical Law
Authors: Laurie, Graeme
Abstract: The author, Laurie, provides an account of the writings of Professor (Emiritus) of Forensic Medicine and Honorary Fellow, Professor J Kenyon Mason.  In this chapter, an extract from Professor Mason's Festschrift, Laurie focusses specifically on Mason's writings on personal autonomy within the field of Medical Law. It draws on a retrospective of cases, of significance in Mason's writings, and considers what the implications are for the future of medical law.</description>
    <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2449">
    <title>Challenging Medical-Legal Norms: The Role of Autonomy, Confidentiality and Privacy in Protecting Individual and Familial Group Rights in Genetic Information</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2449</link>
    <description>Title: Challenging Medical-Legal Norms: The Role of Autonomy, Confidentiality and Privacy in Protecting Individual and Familial Group Rights in Genetic Information
Authors: Laurie, Graeme
Abstract: In this article, Laurie discusses the impact of generating genetic information, and what the consequences are of this for individuals, and family members, whose familial genetic information is shared.  The authors considers who controls access to such information, the rights and interests that arise from a group claim to familial data.  The competing "right to know" versus "the right not to know" are examined in relation to genetic data, along with the role of confidentiality and autonomy. Finally, the article ends with a note on privacy and legislative considerations this may pose.</description>
    <dc:date>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

