<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>ERA Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1951" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1951</id>
  <updated>2013-05-19T09:09:40Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-19T09:09:40Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Learning and self-regulation in translation studies: the experience of students’ in three contrasting undergraduate courses in Saudi Arabia</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6663" />
    <author>
      <name>Al Sahli, Fahad Saad</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Alsahli, Fahad Saad</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6663</id>
    <updated>2013-04-19T12:20:56Z</updated>
    <published>2012-11-29T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Learning and self-regulation in translation studies: the experience of students’ in three contrasting undergraduate courses in Saudi Arabia
Authors: Al Sahli, Fahad Saad; Alsahli, Fahad Saad
Abstract: A great expansion is underway in the Saudi higher education system as it moves&#xD;
from an elite to a mass form of higher education. The number of universities, for&#xD;
example, has jumped from eight universities in 2000 to more than 24 in 2011.&#xD;
Given the scale of investment called for, questions are being increasingly asked&#xD;
about the effectiveness of the higher education system. As a contribution to those&#xD;
processes of greater scrutiny, the present study explores the perceptions of Saudi&#xD;
students of learning and teaching in translation studies. The broad aim of the&#xD;
study is to throw some light on how students learn and regulate their learning in&#xD;
translation studies, and how they are influenced by the course design. While the&#xD;
strongest emphasis of this study was on students’ self-regulation of their&#xD;
learning, this is presented as one aspect of their approaches to learning, and in&#xD;
order to illuminate these self-regulated approaches to learning, students’&#xD;
perceptions of the teaching and learning environments (TLEs), and their&#xD;
orientations to learning were examined as well.&#xD;
Three contrasting undergraduate courses were examined using a mixed method&#xD;
approach combining Likert-style questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.&#xD;
A total of 352 students were surveyed using an adapted version of Vermunt’s&#xD;
Inventory of Learning Styles (ILS). This was complemented by interviews with&#xD;
34 students. Six case studies were drawn out from the interview data for indepth&#xD;
analysis of students’ experience of studying in this particular context.&#xD;
In order to capture the richness and distinctiveness of the learning in translation&#xD;
studies, it was necessary to distinguish two contrasting approaches; one of them&#xD;
is a deep self-regulated approach, and the other is a surface unregulated approach&#xD;
to studying. Each of these approaches is contextualised within the learning in&#xD;
translation studies. There were some important environmental influences on these approaches including: course characteristics, classroom teaching, and&#xD;
feedback and assessment. In addition to this, four types of orientations were&#xD;
discerned among those group of students; academic, personal, vocational, and&#xD;
social. All of these types have intrinsic and extrinsic forms except the personal&#xD;
and the social which had intrinsic forms only.&#xD;
The study concludes with conceptual, methodological, and practical implications&#xD;
drawn from the findings. Perhaps the most important implication is the need to&#xD;
improve students’ skills in self-regulation over the course of their studies. This&#xD;
research provides insights into the experience of learning of this group of&#xD;
students, at the same time it emphasises the need for more studies on this under-researched&#xD;
group of students.</summary>
    <dc:date>2012-11-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Transmission of cultural values in the production of EFL textbooks for the Chinese primary curriculum</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6573" />
    <author>
      <name>Li, Jingyi</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6573</id>
    <updated>2013-02-27T12:09:11Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-29T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Transmission of cultural values in the production of EFL textbooks for the Chinese primary curriculum
Authors: Li, Jingyi
Abstract: In the global world, cultural issues relating to the subject of English as Foreign&#xD;
Language (EFL) have become important. This is especially the case when&#xD;
considering the EFL curriculum for Chinese Primary Education.&#xD;
Many writers have addressed the nature of curriculum design as knowledge and&#xD;
cultural reproduction, but usually in the North American and European literature.&#xD;
This research takes these debates and relocates them in the context of China as it&#xD;
enters a new market economy, embedded in its own version of ‘internationalism’.&#xD;
The 2001 national curriculum marked the beginning of China’s educational reform.&#xD;
From a reading of this literature, two main questions emerged: 1) what cultural&#xD;
values are transmitted through EFL textbooks for Chinese Primary Education?; 2)&#xD;
how do curriculum-making processes impact upon textbook production? The&#xD;
findings provide an important insight into knowledge and cultural reproduction in&#xD;
Chinese Education, especially in the subject of EFL.&#xD;
Two volumes of EFL textbooks, which were used in primary schools, were selected&#xD;
to examine the delivery of cultural values. Based on these initial findings, the&#xD;
researcher conducted a series of interviews and focus groups in order to trace the&#xD;
process of textbook production and curriculum creation. Participants included&#xD;
educational administrators in the Ministry of Education in China, curriculum&#xD;
designers, textbook editors from both Chinese and foreign publishers as well as&#xD;
classroom teachers.&#xD;
Research findings suggest that, the production of EFL textbooks should be&#xD;
recognised as a part of curriculum-making processes in the context of Chinese&#xD;
Primary Education. The ‘textbook’ can be seen as the ‘official’ interpretation of the&#xD;
Chinese culture. Indeed, the EFL curriculum is recognized as a vehicle for moral&#xD;
education by policy makers and educators. EFL textbooks include many moral messages promoting expected behaviour in contemporary China – ‘diligence,&#xD;
independence, respect and obedience, patriotism and collectivism’.&#xD;
The processes of generating this ‘production’ have spaces for less ‘official’ and more&#xD;
‘hidden’ curriculum messages. Indeed, ‘lacunae’ – hidden spaces – in EFL&#xD;
curriculum design and textbook production have been identified.&#xD;
Various key players are involved in the curriculum-making process, including the&#xD;
State, its agencies, and intellectuals. However, instead of being a straight top-down&#xD;
structure led by the political elites, the strict control of the State over curriculum&#xD;
policy-making is finely nuanced. In fact, it was found that the practices of&#xD;
curriculum-making involve a complicated State-intellectuals partnership.&#xD;
Further, it is mainly the culture of the intellectual group which is reproduced through&#xD;
the EFL subject in Chinese Primary Education. Textbook editors and censors,&#xD;
inherently part of the intellectual elites, and key players in the curriculum designing&#xD;
process, rely heavily upon their own version of ‘common sense’.&#xD;
This thesis therefore concludes that the ‘hidden spaces’ through which curriculum&#xD;
design, development and delivery take place, generate a more nuanced understanding&#xD;
of Chinese cultural reproduction, than has previously been thought.</summary>
    <dc:date>2012-06-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Unmasking online reflective practices in higher education</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6321" />
    <author>
      <name>Ross, Jennifer</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6321</id>
    <updated>2012-08-22T13:46:23Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-29T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Unmasking online reflective practices in higher education
Authors: Ross, Jennifer
Abstract: Online reflective practices that are high-stakes – summatively assessed, or used as&#xD;
evidence for progression or membership in a professional body – are increasingly&#xD;
prevalent in higher education, especially in professional and vocational programmes.&#xD;
A combination of factors is influencing their emergence: an e-learning agenda that&#xD;
promises efficiency and ubiquity; a proliferation of employability, transferable skills&#xD;
and personal development planning policies; a culture of surveillance which prizes&#xD;
visibility and transparency; and teacher preference for what are seen as&#xD;
empowering pedagogies.&#xD;
This thesis analyses qualitative interview data to explore how students and teachers&#xD;
negotiate issues of audience, performance and authenticity in their high-stakes online&#xD;
reflective practices. Using mask metaphors, and taking a post-structuralist&#xD;
and specifically Foucauldian perspective, the work examines themes of performance,&#xD;
trace, disguise, protection, discipline and transformation. The central argument is that&#xD;
the effects of both compulsory reflection, and writing online, destabilise and&#xD;
ultimately challenge the humanist ideals on which reflective practices are based:&#xD;
those of a ‘true self’ which can be revealed, understood, recorded, improved or&#xD;
liberated through the process of writing about thoughts and experiences.&#xD;
Rather than revealing and developing the ‘true self’, reflecting online and for&#xD;
assessment produces fragmented, performing, cautious, strategic selves. As a result,&#xD;
it offers an opportunity to work critically with an awareness of audience, genres of&#xD;
writing and shifting subjectivity. This is rarely, if ever, explicitly the goal of such&#xD;
practices. Instead, online reflective practices are imported wholesale from their&#xD;
offline counterparts without acknowledgement of the difference that being online&#xD;
makes, and issues of power in high-stakes reflection are disguised or ignored.&#xD;
Discourses of authentic self-knowledge, personal and professional development, and&#xD;
transformative learning are not appropriate to the nature of high-stakes online&#xD;
reflection. The combination creates passivity, anxiety and calculation, it normalises&#xD;
surveillance, and it produces rituals of confession and compliance. More critical&#xD;
approaches to high-stakes online reflection, which take into account&#xD;
addressivity, experimentation and digitality, are proposed.</summary>
    <dc:date>2012-06-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rough ground of character: a philosophical investigation into character development, examining a wilderness expedition case study through a virtue ethical lens</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6306" />
    <author>
      <name>Stonehouse, Victor Paul</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6306</id>
    <updated>2012-08-22T13:31:40Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-29T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Rough ground of character: a philosophical investigation into character development, examining a wilderness expedition case study through a virtue ethical lens
Authors: Stonehouse, Victor Paul
Abstract: There is a long-held assumption that Outdoor Adventure Education (OAE) can&#xD;
develop character. However, little research has explored this belief. While many&#xD;
practitioners, and some scholars, remain committed to character development&#xD;
through OAE, the literature also reveals a growing body of discomfort and suspicion&#xD;
surrounding this assumption. This dissent centres on the vague nature of the term&#xD;
“character,” and the moral philosophical complexities surrounding the concept of&#xD;
character itself. Until “character” is more clearly explicated, any resolution to the&#xD;
current confusion is unlikely.&#xD;
This thesis employs Aristotle’s virtue theory, as espoused in his Nicomachean&#xD;
Ethics, to articulate an understanding of character. Although several scholars have&#xD;
used virtue ethics, commonly referred to as character ethics, to support their claims&#xD;
of character development through OAE, these treatments have been preliminary,&#xD;
warranting this more detailed account.&#xD;
When viewed from this virtue ethical perspective, the question, “Can character be&#xD;
developed through OAE?,” becomes problematic. For Aristotle cautions that&#xD;
different subjects of inquiry yield differing levels of accuracy, and with regard to&#xD;
ethical investigations, such as those into character, one must be content to “indicate&#xD;
the truth roughly and in outline” (I 3§4). Further complicating the matter, Aristotle&#xD;
asserts that virtue, a disposition, and the building block of character is gradually and&#xD;
arduously inculcated over long periods of time (I 7§16).&#xD;
While virtue theory implies that radical character transformation is, in any context,&#xD;
unlikely over brief stints of time, this does not mean that OAE programmes are of&#xD;
little moral worth. To the contrary, a detailed examination into a virtue ethical&#xD;
understanding of character suggests that certain elements of OAE programmes may&#xD;
xii&#xD;
have strong moral relevance. This relevance is found in Aristotle’s three conditions&#xD;
that cultivate the development of virtue, conditions readily found within many OAE&#xD;
courses: moral reflection; moral practice; and sharing in the moral lives of others.&#xD;
Drawing on my own interest and experience within OAE, an expedition seemed an&#xD;
ideal setting to explore the presence and content of Aristotle’s three conditions. In&#xD;
hope of discovering this moral narrative, a qualitative case study was conducted on a&#xD;
two-week wilderness expedition in the Adirondack Mountains of New York. The&#xD;
expedition was a first-year transition experience for students attending a Christian&#xD;
liberal college in the United States. Utilising interviews as a primary method, and&#xD;
observations and texts as secondary methods, the research explored the participants’&#xD;
expedition experience from a virtue ethical perspective.&#xD;
A thematic analysis revealed that participants reported reflecting on their moral lives&#xD;
in both formal (e.g. group reviews, solo, journals) and informal (e.g. while hiking&#xD;
and performing camp chores) settings. Similarly, whether through the mental and&#xD;
physical endurance required in off-trail navigation, or the care expressed through the&#xD;
acts of service and gracious tolerance necessitated by the social demands of&#xD;
expeditionary life, the participants viewed their wilderness travel as a constant&#xD;
opportunity for moral practice. Lastly, the participants identified the community&#xD;
formed on their expedition to be integral to their increased moral self-perception.&#xD;
Although a virtue ethical perspective precludes claiming anything definitive&#xD;
regarding the participants’ character development, at the least, the expedition can be&#xD;
said to have contributed to their moral journey in ways that are directly relevant to&#xD;
their character.</summary>
    <dc:date>2012-06-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

