<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2013-05-22T07:27:18Z</responseDate><request identifier="oai:www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk:1842/6191" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/dspace-oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk:1842/6191</identifier><datestamp>2012-07-24T15:26:26Z</datestamp><setSpec>hdl_1842_1688</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Prescribing aid coordination in Uganda’s health sector</dc:title><dc:creator>Taylor, Emma Michelle</dc:creator><dc:subject>aid</dc:subject><dc:subject>coordination</dc:subject><dc:subject>effectiveness</dc:subject><dc:subject>Uganda</dc:subject><dc:subject>health sector</dc:subject><dc:description>This thesis aims to contribute to the body of work that seeks to unpack development
by asking: how does development work? Using a purposive case study of Uganda
and taking a mixed methods approach, the thesis explores the reality behind the
rhetoric of aid coordination in a developing health sector, questioning the premise
that coordination is pursued exclusively to improve the efficacy of official
development assistance (as inferred by partners‟ vocal commitments to the tenets of
the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness). The study focuses on the member
groups currently empowered to join Uganda‟s most important multi-stakeholder
forum for health - the Health Policy Advisory Committee - finding that all members
are guilty of picking and choosing from a checklist of voluntary coordination
commitments. This is found to be at once logical - for facilitating the semblance of
partnership between a disparate grouping of stakeholders with differing modi
operandi, agency objectives and tolerance for risk – and advantageous - for masking
difference and allowing outwardly homogenous groupings like the Health
Development Partners to speak with “one voice” when addressing the Ugandan
government. Most importantly of all however, partial adherence to the aid
coordination ethos is found to permit the framing that aid to Uganda is at once
necessary and well targeted, as the Government of Uganda actively invites its
partners to participate in the processes of government at the central level. Such
tangible commitments to the tenets of partnership and transparency are integral to
maintaining donor confidence in the aftermath of two financial scandals involving
the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and the Global Alliance for
Vaccines and Immunisation in 2005. In sum, the thesis argues that while on the
surface coordination appears important for its internal significance - as an organising
principle to improve the effectiveness of aid - in fact, the value of coordination stems
from its external significance. Coordination creates a façade of unity which permits
the continuance of aid flows to Uganda, with coordination activities now playing a
pivotal role in determining who gives and receives aid, and how it should be spent.</dc:description><dc:publisher>The University of Edinburgh</dc:publisher><dc:contributor>Smith, James</dc:contributor><dc:contributor>Harper, Ian</dc:contributor><dc:date>2012-07-24T15:26:26Z</dc:date><dc:date>2012-07-24T15:26:26Z</dc:date><dc:date>2011-11-22</dc:date><dc:type>Thesis or Dissertation</dc:type><dc:type>Doctoral</dc:type><dc:type>PhD Doctor of Philosophy</dc:type><dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6191</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>